Can you walk me through your evaluation and decision-making process for selecting a new ERP system?
What were the most important criteria you used to assess the different ERP solutions you considered?
How well did our solution meet your functional and technical requirements compared to the competitor's?
What was your perception of the quality and value of our implementation services vs. the competitor's?
How did you assess the total cost of ownership for each solution?
Please describe your interactions with our sales team during the process.
Were there any other factors outside of the two ERP options that impacted your final choice?
Looking back, is there anything we could have done differently that may have changed the outcome?
Based on my interview with Jane Doe, the primary reasons Globex chose the competitor's ERP solution over Acme Software were:
The competitor's product had a slight edge in meeting Globex's complex manufacturing requirements out-of-the-box. Acme's solution would have required more customization.
Globex had serious concerns about Acme's ability to handle the global rollout based on our limited experience with multi-site implementations. The competitor had more referenceable customers of similar size and scope.
While Acme's software licensing costs were competitive, the estimated professional services fees to implement and integrate the system came in higher than the competition, resulting in a 15% higher TCO.
Acme's sales team took too long to respond to several key technical and support questions during the evaluation. This made Globex question our expertise and commitment.
Globex's VP of Operations had a prior positive experience with the competitor's software at her last company which gave them additional comfort and confidence in going with their solution.
To improve Acme's chances of winning similar ERP deals in the future, I suggest:
Investing in product development to enhance our out-of-the-box fit for key manufacturing verticals and reduce implementation complexity/cost.
Building out our service delivery capabilities and partnerships to better handle large, global rollouts. Develop more relevant case studies.
Revisiting our professional services pricing model and project scoping approach to ensure we are competitive on TCO.
Improving our sales enablement and competitive intelligence to arm reps with faster, more complete answers to technical questions and objection handling.
Conducting a win/loss analysis on a regular basis to continuously monitor our competitive position and identify areas for improvement. Consider a third-party to interview customers for unbiased feedback.